"Prying eyes are everywhere."

It's good to see Gowling reaching out - they will want to build a picture of what investors knew and when. A defence of Tenor's may be that investors had the opportunity to be involved and chose not to (until recently).

It may sound paranoid to think there are "prying eyes" but it isn't. I don't think in this case it will matter but both companies and lawyers have been known to read these forums and use this information to try to gain an advantage.

I hope Gowling are operating with a timetable in mind and that action by them may signal expected action on the award front.