"There may be some disagreement on this board  but I always differentiated between stakeholders (Tenor, etc) and shareholders (that's us) in all these reportings. Shareholders are not entitled to the full information provided by the settlement including Gowling. Hope I'm wrong."

I hope you're wrong too. It mentions "equity holders" in there, wouldn't that be shareholders or certain ones? I am assuming Gowling has dug in deep enough to have had an influence on getting access to the agreement details. Just assuming on my part.