Rooski, I don't know the answer to your question of whether it is committee/opt-ins who are entitled, or is it all commons who are entitled as a result of the Committee Goslings legal action.

One might have thought that if it there was only one solitary common share-holder entitled to a settlement, then legally it would have to be the entire class of common shareholders who are entitled. But I hope that is not correct (appologies to any common shareholders who are not opt-ins or committee).

At the time the Committe was formed and Gosslings was retained there was a question that if one did not "opt-in" that one may not be entitled to a portion of the settlement. So, from a legal perspective, would it be OK for only the opt-in/Committee common shareholders to receive a distribution of a portion of the winnings, while the remaining common shareholders received none?

thelongrunner