Thank you Luxembourg for bringing this up, and if you and Peterpan dont mind, my conclusion is that like FO, PHUN activity preceeds a news release by several days, and after the release of news share price goes down and volume stagnates. It could mean that the same players are involved in both companies. The same players would be investors that follow MAB and his companies. The conundrum is how is it that some investors get to trade on information before it is public. It is an issue that has not been resolved in respect to Falcon. It certainly adds no confidence on the system or management if the same pattern is also detected in other MAB companies. I would not be here if I did not see a huge upside for the Mako play, I would not care less for the instos and mab cronies that dont seem to play by the rules.

db