OK, I plead ignorance too and need someone to clarify the following

Look at image 3. The depth is 5052.5m to 5053.4m (Lower Endrod). Notice that on the right, there is a scale from 0 to 100% for the lithology. Sand is shown in yellow. Sand is good! The sand graph is almost 100%.

This is less than 1 meter (about 3 feet) , how is that good?, I cannot envisage trillions of cubit feet of gas in such puny interval.

Looking back at the Scotia report:

At the base of this sequence at 5,055 m, a strong gas show was encountered and at 5,068 m loss of mud into the formation was noted. These are indications of permeability.

Again, we need a lot more that tiny intervals of permeability and gas bearing rock to make us rich. Let it all loose lanman. We swim in money but the techie stuff leaves us cold. I bet TK's famous research team has it all figured out, but he is not telling.

db