Going back to the size of the Aquifer mentioned in Iceland in 2003,we can compare it to the size of lake Michigan.The report explains that the extension is streched upon 40 000 km3 and 2-300 m depth.We shouldn`t lose sleep over the size of this ocean.

I just wanted to point out the demensions of water we are talking about and the MAKO explorers have to deal with succeeding in exploiting the Trough.

".......geologists have observed so called stratigraphic windows in the Pannonian Basin which allow active vertical communication between single aquifers/deposits/lenses in different depths....." (your vision)

"......The same vertical water system over several hundred of meters depth?........." (mine) . I can not realize any fundamental distinction so far.....

1) The Scotia Report Estimate from May 2006 was updated in May 2008.How would the new facts and the water aquifer problem influence a new update from Scotia in 2010 ?

2) Can you express the following in a way which everyone can understand ?:

"We can not dismiss the possibility of compaction disequilibrium subsequently supplimented by hydrocarbon generation."

Soly warmly recommended the video for better understanding,being an investor,and the above play of words was the final conclusion to build on.

I do not want to destruct your "little theory" and will certainly not end up in an epic post neither,but I would very much appreciate your answer even if you have to call in one of your experts.....

(BTW: "..... the whole operation is a huge Scam...." RC & JR would say "Yep")