>Not really. As I said the last time someone is doing a sloppy work at Reuters in the last few weeks.

And what you wrote previously.

>>Well we saw earlier that the majors are slowly increasing the amount of shares they own.

>Well, I say it’s quite a bit more than just “slowly”. Actually the Reuters Report shows an increase of 8,089,700 shares since my last report on March 7th, just 9 days ago.

>But if you check the 2 tables you’ll notice the sloppy work by Reuters, or is it? Anyway take a look

I agree Reuters is sloppy in they're representation of insider holdings, they always have been. However, there is nothing to suggest increased (or decreased) positions as you did imply earlier. The notion of Reuters purposely misrepresenting the holdings info is over the top, even for you.