It is true that Falcon did a wonderful job in messaging, but we must also ask one question--why have they (Falcon) not been more transparent with the seismic information? True---they found another vein of shale (unconventional) oil in the North, but would it not be prudent, if true, to disclose what the data supports? Does it match or enhance the two previous study estimates. They say it does, but show us the information? If it were better or even matched previously estimated expectations wouldn't Hess, who is working and wants to be a oil production company only, been more judicious in their desire to stay on board? Granted, this may be a better situation long-term for us should a Chevron or the like decide to play, but I do think, hope I am wrong, that the news on the seismic was just OK......if it were grand....Hess would have stayed to play and Falcon would be running around holding the results out. I've been a long-term holder of several hundred thousand shares---dead money---and will continue to hold....but something just does not feel right in Aussie......share price would be improved if Falcon would disclose Seismic information. And, I think if it were spectacular they would be standing and screaming from the Mountain Top.

Becoming pessimistic......sorry, but his has been a long road and this does not feel good anylonger.

KYSKYBOLT