Highly prospective exploration company

Resource projects cover more than 1,713 km2 in three provinces at various stages, including the following: hematite magnetite iron formations, titaniferous magnetite & hematite, nickel/copper/PGM, chromite, Volcanogenic Massive and gold.

Free
Message: missing pieces to a threesome
13
Dec 27, 2010 01:13PM
5
Dec 27, 2010 01:46PM
11
Dec 28, 2010 04:53PM
6
Dec 29, 2010 12:36AM
4
Dec 29, 2010 08:25PM
3
Dec 30, 2010 12:59AM
16
Jan 03, 2011 04:46PM

1) where is Larsen with Lac Lamalee? Is the dynamic a) any progress we make with Lac Lamalee is contrary to CHM interests, b) any progress we make improves the overall Fermont value for a package deal, c) irrelevent, a major will try to snatch properties one at a time no matter who owns it. Has anyone talked to him recently?

2) Where is Pat Sheridan with Lac Lamalee. Will he or has he already made a deal where he's sold his 50% interest to CHM or another player? Do we have right of first refusal to an offer? What are the consequences if CHM owns Lac Lamalee. Perhaps, they'll get it drilled right away.

3) I know we've done some initial geophysics over Lac Lamalee, but have we identified targets? Do we need some down hole geophysics to know exactly where to collar up? How long will it take to get a hole going? Can Larsen lend a hand here or would he be willing?

4) Will Ron Wortel and Mineralfields tolerate a tiring Smith strategy of waiting to let Champion prove up surrounding territory before even poking a hole. Do they want to wait that long? Looking at the map, I don't see this as a strategy because the surrounding properties are already proved up. Lamalee Lake is smack dab in the middle of a threesome. Consolidated Thompson/Wisco Lamalee and Peppler is on one border, Arcelormittal's Fire Lake Mine and Champion's Firelake North share another border. So at this point our property is surrounded by cozy threesome of comprising of at least 2.4 billion tons of iron ore and that number needs an increased updating. So at this point, it's really time for Fancamp and Sheridan to begin drilling. Or is there some master behind the scenes strategy we are unaware of?

5) Again, promotion. I just communicated with a ROF investor who still didn't get the fact that Fancamp has moved on from McFaulds. He was hesitant to buy into Fancamp because he wasn't sure Noront's feeder zone entered FNC's land? Well Wes has one theory and Smith and Harvey have another theory...etc...yawn! Haven't you been reading these posts? Fancamp is an iron exploration company. CHM, LacLamalee, Magpie, RGX. McFaulds is a bonus if we hit nickel once Mike gets back up to McFaulds. Fancamp needs to promote, perhaps in league with Champion, about what Fermont is all about.

Perhaps Peter can find some English investors to increase demand and raise the SP, because his promoting tactics aren't working. The iron ore is now known, so according to his theory, the SP should reflect the ore value. Well, .50c is truly silly. I don't get it? So if the sign says pull, and your still pushing... new strategy.

Also Fancamp's website needs an updated map promoting iron ore. And, we need some News Releases giving us updated interpretations and maps of the targets our threesome neighbors hit iron and how it relates to Lac Lamalee. Has Larsen completed any new geophysics over Lamalee? Can we put it on the website. By the way, if anyone reading regularly talks to Larsen, tell him to update CHM's website. The ore numbers are off.

StockGreed

9
Jan 10, 2011 03:10AM
Share
New Message
Please login to post a reply