A couple of comments.

My recollection of the AUM short situation is that the shorts do not represent a very high percentage of the outstanding shares. I gather that Andy is saying that the banksters can destroy a stock like AUM with unlimited short selling. I don't understand how that could take place without someone taking prompt legal action and forcing the issue further into the public limelight.

Secondly, I believe that Sprott holds a fairly significant number of AUM shares and that he bought more not too long ago. Why would he do that if he believes in Andy's predictions?

Just wondering.