Re: Help!! ............estimate methodology?..next question
in response to
by
posted on
Sep 08, 2008 08:29AM
The company is exploring for nickel deposits on its Langmuir property near Timmins, Ontario; for nickel-gold-copper on its Cleaver and Douglas properties; and for molybdenum and rare earth elements at recently acquired Desrosiers property.
When the company started to report using true width etc
Should the calculation be looking at true width instead?
Drill Hole |
From (m) |
To (m) |
Core Length (m) |
True Width (m) |
Core Length (ft) |
True Width (ft) |
Weighted Average Ni (%) |
LS07-2 |
|
313.75 |
378.05 |
64.30 |
41.33 |
210.96 |
135.60 |
0.820 |
and |
||||||||
|
313.75 |
354.00 |
40.25 |
25.87 |
132.05 |
84.88 |
0.224 |
|
and |
||||||||
|
354.00 |
366.00 |
12.00 |
7.71 |
39.37 |
25.30 |
0.328 |
|
and |
||||||||
|
366.00 |
377.00 |
11.00 |
7.07 |
36.09 |
23.20 |
3.596 |
|
and contains |
||||||||
|
366.95 |
372.40 |
5.45 |
3.50 |
17.88 |
11.48 |
6.453 |
|
with |
366.95 |
368.00 |
1.05 |
0.67 |
3.44 |
2.20 |
4.380 |
|
|
368.00 |
369.10 |
1.10 |
0.71 |
3.61 |
2.33 |
3.865 |
|
|
369.10 |
370.20 |
1.10 |
0.71 |
3.61 |
2.33 |
4.635 |
|
|
370.20 |
371.30 |
1.10 |
0.71 |
3.61 |
2.33 |
9.070 |
|
|
371.30 |
372.40 |
1.10 |
0.71 |
3.61 |
2.33 |
10.220 |
|
and contains |
||||||||
|
372.40 |
373.20 |
0.80 |
0.51 |
2.62 |
1.67 |
1.085 |
|
and |
||||||||
|
373.20 |
373.90 |
0.70 |
0.45 |
2.30 |
1.48 |
1.995 |