"Any ideas as to why there were so many last minute 100 share trades last week hitting the ask ? Seems odd.

v."

Was it you finally buying in??

"Whoever it was that said that maybe Langmuir#1 and Langmuir#2 were maybe connected is probable wrong. The geology of the Shaw Dome is such that "pockets" or nodes of nickel bearing rock occur and not long massive stringers."

I am not sure what we may find them to be, but their "continuity" in whatever geological form will be key. Maybe they are veins that sit on the vertical( on end )and we are simply seeing the tip of the iceberg? Here's a quote from the Hughes camp at GCR after the completion of their VTEM

"The Langmuir Property includes over 30 kilometres of ultramafic and mafic flows and sills favourable for hosting nickel, copper and platinum group mineralization. May 2007 drilling intersected 1.14% nickel over 72.45 metres, including two separate heavily mineralized intervals of 2.23% nickel, 0.22% copper, 0.20 g/t platinum and 0.50 g/t palladium over 17.50 metres of drill core, and 1.74 % nickel, 0.12% copper, 0.20 g/t platinum and 0.47 g/t palladium over 13.10 metres of drill core. The Company has detected numerous large conductive bodies by new modelling of the Langmuir airborne VTEM survey data. The conductive bodies occur at depths of over 300 metres beneath the discovery zone, have similar geophysical signatures, and can be traced for over 2 kilometres along strike."

I also really liked to read this part of the Darcel report in which he quotes from Jenson:

"This valuation does not attempt to compare the Company with other exploration projects nearby including Golden Chalice,Liberty Mines, First Nickel, and Starfire Minerals. The area appears to have large structures that extend across claims. The entire area may become a target for development by a multi-national mining company, which suggests that a higher in-situ Ni valuation is warranted. If the Company doubles this reports estimate of Ni at Langmuir through detailed drilling, then it is likely to become a target.

The methodology applied to estimating Ni at Langmuir 1 did not attempt to “fill-in” gaps in core sample data, where the summarized report excluded a length between reported samples. It is the opinion of the writer that the effect would be that Ni estimated at Langmuir 1 is low.

From the Jensen report (p.48): “Detailed mapping and interpretation indicates that both the Langmuir No.1 and No.2 deposits occur at the same stratigraphic position on opposite limbs of an anticline / syncline pair and implies that the favourable stratigraphy may be repeated at several locations on the property.” In the author’s opinion, this should be interpreted as meaning that the above Ni poundage estimates are a starting point, and that significantly more Ni is highly likely to be found at the Company’s Langmuir area properties after they drill into the 40-60 anomalies they are targeting over the next year."

We have a lot to wait for and look forward to. Ni43-101, Scoping study and the VTEM to name my top three

-Geotech Commisioned For VTEM Survey June 26, 2008

-Key Milestone Achieved - Inspiration Mining Initiates Scoping June 4, 2008

-Micon International Commissioned for NI 43-101 Report May 16, 2008