Funny that you were putting the 3d model together as a weekend interest thing for you and your techie friend. This then turned into a project where you were suddenly more concerned and interested with boundary lines of claims etc. Only after being "pooped on" you want all the drill results and even ask if Beer can get them for you from Randy or IR.

I point out that you missed the boat bigtime even with the basic map in which you build this whole model let alone missing the first half of the drill results. Using a historic map showing the drilling from the earlier decades under former companies. The presentation is poor at best but you find the space to get the boundry reg up for a good 20% of the presentation.

Whatever point it is you were trying to make it wasn't about wanting to map our 3-d ore body was it? You failed miserably at what we as ISM shareholders were wanting to see and likely did an embarassing job of trying to prove whatever it is the you, Nickel77 and for that matter, a couple others who chimed in on boundary and lease/claims were wanting to portray and illustrate.

The fact that you throw in the towel when only half a job is done says lots. As for legalities that you claim to be concerned about and adhereing to, why not stay away from the "effort" completely. I did point out to you that the early and first drill results are indeed available on Sedar.

Anyone withthe right tools could have built it over a period of time and simply made a big disclaimer saying what it's intent is and was with all the available data. You chose to do otherwise and your story since changes by the day. No wonder you are getting heat.

IMHO