Not at all unless you are a trader hoping for the big pop today. The good stuff is yet to come.

- Figure also that you are talking about a 228 page read. (BTW released as news at the open)

-Figure that todays NR is really a big understatement. The NR didn't even touch on or attempt to play up any "highlights" . Just released with a "more to come" ring to it.

-Figure that for anyone to get the jist of today's NR they have to go to Sedar and mine this report out and sit down and digest it.

Not the average task for joe public and the retail investment folks now is it.

- Figure too, what have you come across in it that says, He&& I better run out and get some ISM pronto?......

Here's one little observation I liked. BTW Wait until Joe Public tries to digest and comprehend a met study or some such reports?

The resource calc will be interesting.

Appendix K:

Hey did you notice that Activation Lab's reassaying had/has consistently shown their Ni values to be higher than Swastika in most samples I have scanned?

Start on page 184 with the LN05-2 sample stream right up to LN08-118. After LN08-118 to LN08-150 (pg 197)we do not have Activation labs info, only Swastika....so can we assume Swastika is shy on the Ni?? Those last holes are the deep drilling exploratory holes

Our last official drill results release (Mar 02.09) shows drilling up to LN08-148 and that hole "was planned at the same setup but not drilled"

Appendix M (Page 205) for Langmuir 1 much the same most Nickel values showing higher for Activation labs over the past Swastika labs assays. L105-1 thru L108-118

Wow........so what does that do for the resource calc? Hye I sure hope James Darcel gets an update he would like to see these results. The extra assay values for PGM credits should make mining interesting IMHO