You brought up an opinion Jan 09/10 and never came back to either follow up or acknowledge anyone's input on the topic. We also know that ISM will follow up on Micon recommendations WRT Langmuir.

http://agoracom.com/ir/Inspiration/forums/discussion/topics/394419-inferred-resource/messages/1307603#message

It would seem that some folks thought there was possibly a mistake made in categorization of the ore. In the 6 weeks since, it has been consistent in many many places now. Indicated is clearly mentioned in company news releases on two occasions wrt Langmuir and Micon's report, the actual Micon report and now the lastest quarterly filings for ISM.

"Pursuant to the Micon Report, resources in the Indicated Resources category for the Langmuir North deposit are 8,324,000 tonnes grading 0.40% nickel, as detailed in Table 1 of that report. Resources in the Indicated Resources category for the Langmuir No. 1 deposit are 1,733,000 tonnes grading 0.51% nickel, as detailed in Table 2 of that report.

Both deposits are amenable to open pit exploitation. This factor is highly significant in that mining costs for open pit mining are only a fraction of those for underground mining. This directly impacts the extent of ore which is economically producible. Langmuir No.1 is also partly accessible from an existing development ramp from earlier historical production.

These deposits, lying within the Langmuir Nickel Belt, are also accompanied by at least four (4) exploration target areas of mineralization that are believed to hold the potential to host an additional 20 to 40 million tonnes of nickel mineralization of similar grades. In addition, the target areas also have the potential for open-pittable configuration."