B, That's my point, exactly. It's NOT a good thing. It's a neutral thing at best. Eric King is a good thing. Keith Barron is a good thing. Anyone who would base an investment decision on such data from Canaccord/Adams is in the wrong place. Canaccord/Adams' advice or recommendations are at best not worth paying attention to, and at worst, damaging to the master investor's mindset. And that is what we are shooting for, master-investor status. Sure, not everyone can achieve that, but a few can. And those who are in Kimber, whether they realize it yet or not, are in the right place to do so. Birds of a feather do flock together. And opportunities to achieve great wealth are rare by definition. It must be this way. Not because I want it this way, but simply because it must. You need to choose your inputs very wisely. Too many inputs screw you up. I would try to steer people away from letting others do their thinking for them, especially people at places like Canaccord/Adams. And I don't want people in this investment who come in because Canaccord/Adams advises so. They'll be the first ones to turn for the door when thing turn down. I need to invest with studs, not weenies! And the people at Canaccord are probably mostly weenies. How do I know that? Primarily because most people are mostly weenies and secondarily, because people who advise people to do things that they mostly don't do tend to be weenies, and guaranteed, most of the people at Canaccord who list Kimber among stocks that are undervalued probably don't own it or even know what it is. If they do own it, they certainly don't have a meaningful position in it. I don't want to deal with them. Time is too precious to listen to their crap. And it is crap. Bull