Goldcarp,

Thanks for the correction. So you don't have an ulterior motive. I'll take you at your word. However, I still cannot understand how you believe posting articles only of the violence in Mexico is helpful. The AP has reported on positive outcomes of the drug war as well, but you do not seem as concerned with making sure this board is aware of them. That is why I question your discretion. Also, as I mentioned, your timing on the initial post that elicited my response was right after Kimber made a nice little run from .60. I suppose, to me, and I can definitely be wrong, but it just seems you don't have much positive to say in regard to Kimber. I am not going to wager (no offense but you are offering a suckers bet), and I am assuredly not going to give my contact info, nothing personal, I wouldn't give it to anyone. Maybe if you could humor me and explain why you bought back in after taking profit, that would clear up my confusion. As obviously you have weighed the risk of violence in Mexico versus owning shares in Kimber and have decided it is worth the risk, or maybe you are not sure it is worth the risk and you are questioning it, that is fine too. I guess what I am saying is, you are obviously concerned with the situation in Mexico, so why own Kimber? I am not trying to antagonize, I am honestly asking. You providing this information will give insight to this board on how you went about weighing the risk to determine it was still a worthy investment.

I am sure you notice the change in tone. You can thank my wife. She read over my shoulder and let me know I wasn't being too Christian. She is right. I will not concede my concern over what I feel is a very lopsided viewpoint that you have on this issue, however I will apologize for being overly abrupt and crass. As much as I do not believe it is all roses in Mexico, I also do not believe it is on the brink of collapse.

Best regards,

Seeker