Ni, Co, Cu, PGM, Au Properties in Ontario Canada

Producing Mines and "state-of-the-art" Mill

Free
Message: Re: John
Icon president SP

Jul 03, 2008 04:27PM

Jul 04, 2008 03:00AM
3
Jul 05, 2008 05:26AM

Jul 05, 2008 02:56PM
2
Jul 05, 2008 07:18PM

Jul 06, 2008 06:27PM

Jul 07, 2008 03:49AM

Jul 07, 2008 09:12AM

Jul 07, 2008 12:32PM

Jul 07, 2008 12:49PM

Jul 07, 2008 01:06PM
2
Jul 07, 2008 02:10PM

Jul 07, 2008 02:46PM
2
Jul 07, 2008 02:51PM
2
Jul 07, 2008 03:03PM
1
Jul 07, 2008 04:03PM
1
Jul 07, 2008 05:13PM

Jul 07, 2008 05:20PM
1
Jul 07, 2008 05:38PM
1
Jul 07, 2008 06:02PM

Jul 07, 2008 06:11PM

Jul 07, 2008 06:16PM
1
Jul 07, 2008 06:55PM

Wanderer,

I'd rather see this:

If we use the companies 43-101 numbers and your hypothetical tonnes, and using my more optimistic Xstrata ( 23% discount, including by product credits) we could get this:

20,000tonnes X 0.88 (recovery) X 0.93%( ave. grade) X 2204(lbs per tonne) X 9.00 (price of nickel) X 0.77 (Xstrata pay out) = 2.5 million received for payment.

20,000tonnes X 0.88 (recovery) X 0.93% (ave. grade) X 2204 (lbs per tonne) X 5.56 ( LBE's stated cost including smelting fees) =2,005,774

Net = 494,225

If we factor in nickel at 9.42 (todays price) and neglect past expenditures such as plant and equipment costs, our cash flow gets considerably better still.

Best

S

5
Jul 07, 2008 09:59PM
1
Jul 08, 2008 01:21AM

Jul 08, 2008 01:23AM

Jul 08, 2008 01:28AM
1
Jul 08, 2008 01:55AM
SP

Jul 08, 2008 09:38AM

Jul 08, 2008 11:29AM
2
Jul 08, 2008 03:24PM

Jul 08, 2008 05:56PM

Jul 08, 2008 05:59PM

Jul 08, 2008 06:11PM
Share
New Message
Please login to post a reply