Two of our most recent interested contributors have a real interest in "stirring the pot" so to speak. Posts are well within the realm of presenting the opposite side of the argument. Concerns about the financial viablility of a company are realistic but when the same topic is presented time and time again it is still repetitive posts. Part of the problem is seen as the same concerned interest in ISM which the ISM shareholders object to. The posts are well withing the rules but does not breed good will between the two companies. These posts are seen as things frightening investors who have seen a down turn in their share prices. We have experienced it when the third quarter results came out. They experienced it when the MICON results came out. Both sides have experienced it with each press release. There are also regular posters to each board now that constantly express concerns about each company. I wonder if it is not more tit for tat. We now has EBF who has shown us his fine "skills" at dominating a web site. Agoracom has advised us that numerous times they have stepped in. ISM shareholders have expressed to them that the banning of posters has been done in Liberty's favour. Tantallon was not banned. Maybe it would help if our posters considered why the ISM shareholders are doing what they are doing. Most posters are not involved in the cross board posting.