Free
Message: LAC and history.

Reading latest posts:

 Personally I would like LAC to become a producer first and not sell C-O project yet. It has been long wait and being conservative in my investment thinking” better one bird in hand then two in a sky”.

 EPA , I agree with trades88 and WB that EPA just wanted to be noticed and somewhat to be relative but they will not stop the approval.

 Political changes- LAC would do good regardless who is in a power, but now since one party will rule the country- LAC might do a bit better but country will not, do not want to get political (we not allowed) but dual /split government always was better for the country.

 In two years China will be number one economical power in a world. Lets not kid ourselves, History is a best teacher and most of Empires from Roman,  Spain, Portugal,  Ottoman, Mongol,  Russia, Britain  lasted between 150-300 years and ended up in shambles after  rotten from inside.

US is “modern empire” with global currency (for now) and constant wars is  approaching that critical age. Will we rote from inside? Will we devaluate our currency and lose world status? I think we will witness this in our life time.

 That is why it is important to make right investment decision to mitigate all those political and financial difficulties of the future. LAC is definitely one of them.

 P.S. Being a history buff, would like to finish on a positive note:  during the Roman empire collapse, the Eastern part of Empire managed to  reinvent themselves and under much better leadership build a successful Byzantine Empire lasting almost 1000 years! So there is a hope.

 Go LAC.

Share
New Message
Please login to post a reply