Hi Atroutfisher, you are correct in seeing the similar looking anomoly that is located on FWR/SPQ/KWG property. However here is where we need to be cautious. Many of these look like NOT anomolies will not be mineralized like NOT's, in fact some will have very low economic value. The only way to prove if each individual anomoly is mineralized, is to drill it.

I like the anomoly of FNC's because that particular anomoly appears to be one and the same as NOT's discovery anomoly. The chances of FNC's being of high economic value is much more probable than most because we already know the northern part of it is the Double Eagles discovery. That picture is the reason Peter Smith Pres of Fancamp believes his property just might contain the motherlode portion of the Double Eagle find.

I eagerly await the new EM survey, since it will be done at much closer spacings and done by helicopter versus airplane in the 2003 survey. Being closer to the ground should give us a better picture. When FNC gets the new survey they plan on doing another on foot to further define the choicest spots to drill.

Back to your question, I would like to say I have a few shares of FWR also, I too like their chances based on those old EM survey pictures.

 It's just a matter of time, before we see another discovery in McFaulds Lake. Those that are in early will do very well when the discovery happens. JMHO

Al