As usual John, rather than carry on a debate/argument, you cut and run when you struggle to intelligently respond to the points or objections raised....

Iam have no idea what a "motherfeeder" is, and I cannot find this term in my dictionary of geological terms... Sounds like more of JD's version of geology.

At any rate John, I never said, after reading the recent NRs, that the source of what is the conduits is not somwhere west of both the E1 and E2 occurences. There is some new information in the NRs, which is to be expected as they generate more data, and one must adjust their thinking accordingly.

Iam also not sure where I ever said that FNC "holds the mother" as you put it. All I ever said is that I beleive that E1 occurence is part of a larger system in the E1 area, and that NOT's neighbours in this area are likely to have some of the mineralization that comprises this system.

NOT clearly state that E1 exists within a conduit, so any intelligent person should be asking themselves: "where is the rest of the conduit?"

Regards,

B.

well...read this from NOT release ....

“It appears that a series of conduits cutting across and through the granodiorite have acted as feeders to the RFI.”...This statement makes it abundantly clear that the "motherfeeders" come from the North thru the Granodiorite....no matter hoe you try to twist, and interpret the NR....the "FACT" is that the 'motherfeeders" to E1 +E2 come from the NORTH and then heads North West, as E2 is the mouth that feeds E1...so your FNC "assumption" that it holds the "mother" is totally erroneuous, not by my say so but by NOT's say so....

And as far as 1.5% 2% combined guesstimates...First all the assays are NOT in yet...so you're premature....Second, I knew you couldn't read....I said COMBINED or the equivilent of 1.5-2% Ni....Those combined figures I estimated in values of $350 to $550 per ton vallue to clarify my original post as to combined....this issue was discussed as my combined or equivilent was not properly understood, in any event my $ figures, may have been too low siince the results for Chromite were higher, actually the highest ever recorded in Canada....

as far as the PGMs it sounds you've given up on finding these....Time and drilling will prove you totally wrong again....lol..

I will not respond to you on this matter anymore, the facts are all there for all to see, and I feel this is just an excersize of repetition of what has already been throuroughly discussed here, and therefore, a waste of time....

IMCO

JD*