Be careful with your scolding big man !!! He who speaks with the jawbone of an ass.

I had a phone conversation with someone last night, whose has a report from a reservoir engineer who did go and look at the logs. I don’t think the logs for BJ#2 are available, not that anything above the Rome would be much good. Convenient that without any comments about hole problems, they had to run casing to the top of the Rome formation in JB#2, meaning they couldn’t run open hole logs from surface the top of the Rome formation.

Therefore, I, my geologist and my reservoir engineer conclude that the report to be for JB # 3, 4 or 5. Unlike you, I don’t claim perfection. Yes, I should have asked. But then, Peter did say, at the AGM, that the formation was all across Morgan County and into the next. What’s a mile this way or that.

The answer to the log review was the reserves are "totally there!"

Reply: But nothing is 100% in oil and gas exploration.

Answer: They have a huge find for certain, in the Copper Ridge.

Mislead shareholders and members of this board, I don't think so! You're the one who won't address specific facts.

Attacking the person instead of the facts is the greatest sign of compliment. I’ll take my bows, as you admit defeat by your actions and hollow words.

Prove to me that the Copper Ridge and Rome formations are empty, and I'll admit error. But we both know that I won't have to. Otherwise, mgmt wouldn't have had any reason to issue so much paper to themselves.