wouldn't completing what they have already started do more to regain credibility than chasing an internet poster? does months with no word about 5 wells hurt more than something posted on the internet? is telling people they can see the "sensitive information" if they sign a confidentialty agreement then not showing it to anyone that makes the request any good for credibility? saying information will be posted by a date and posting nothing?

a person can go back in time on other boards and bashing was the only thing you would read about meo,,,I seem to remember something written by a Bob Moriarty, is that considered slander and/or libel?

MEO will do what they will do but I still would rather them show us what they are doing with wells 1, 2, & 3 and Pincher...I believe this would regain a lot of the credibility they lost,,,until they do this I won't be casting a yes vote for any rollback,,,

What is that old saying,,,Actions speak louder than Words,,,I still have hope, however faint, that MEO will come through with the goods,,,

glta, Sunseeker