Respectfully disagree. As been discussed at length on this board, there is possibility of ``prior art`` citing this technology is not patentable. If others, such as Intel were also patenting this at same time, it may be that others were also discovering this at the same time. Just because Fish and Moore got a patent does not mean it is the only patent nor does it mean it is enforceable. At least that is the gist of what I gathered from discussions on this board. While this is possible, most here think it is unlikely, improbable, etc and that this is merely posturing for negotiations in the settlement.