RE: We don`t need ownership - Ronran pl comment
posted on
Jan 29, 2005 05:11AM
mvaar - The whole case is based on the premise that there is only one inventor of patent 336, Russel Fish. A co-owner can legally license the patent to another without the other party profiting from it. We hope to prove that there is no ``co-owner`` of patent 336. If not, we loose.