If you use $2 as the basis point for establishing ``fluxuation``, then that`s unfair. Although coming a long way, a $2.30 max price gave this company a market cap of what, @ a $Billion or so?...it was run up on momentum.

This also begs the open question - what is the true valuation of this company?...I don`t think there is one yet, there hasn`t been enough measureable activity (hence Q/Q growth) to establish a base...so IMO it will drift and trend down, based on (assumed) buyback activity and the ebb and flow of emo on this and other boards.

At the time of the SHM, the SP was @ 1.10/1.15. That`s when the statement was made, so I use that as the baseline.

Also, I don`t think (at least not with me) that the ``personal relationships`` are as extensive as you`d think. Over the years of chatting on the boards, of course you develop a degree of comradere. I think your`re assigning a level of group think about this stock and the Longs that doesn`t really exist.

Since I believe you`ve been around for quite a while, you`ve already recieived a generous ROI, which you`re well entitled to. You also seem intelligent enough to be successful in trading in and out. Good for you, and I assume and hope you have made significant amounts.

Once we see consistent Q/Q growth, I would expect more stability, but probably still a sawtooth pattern of such which would smooth out proportially with each successive quarter (assumed).

Even though this is company that`s been around, it`s a baby interms of producing revenue.

JMHO

regards