I realize that. I was wondering why they would have settled
if they were protected by an indemnification clause. It is
very curious to me. The problem is we are not given details
on our settlements. For instance, was the infringer settlement for all or one of the patents, which ones, and etc. They may have indemnification provisions on only one
or two of the patents. We just don`t know. But we are finding little bits and pieces every day.
Thanks for your input.