In the letter DP said that they (directors)
posted on
Sep 21, 2006 10:12AM
had discussions with SEC attorneys BEFORE the dividends were paid out. I now wonder if this had anything to do with getting Swartz satisfied as they must have gotten the dividends also. Perhaps this was part of a grand scheme to work out a deal with Swartz--I just thought that it was strange that they had discussins with SEC attorneys before the dividends were paid. Getting ducks in a row? ads