Re: New Pacer--UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT
in response to
by
posted on
Mar 16, 2007 05:03PM
What I do not understand is why all these extensions and only for 7 days. I have to believe something is close....for several reasons:
First, why would you state,
"This extension is not being sought for the purpose of delay, but because the paries are addressing complicated issues regarding documents from previous litigations,"
if it is as complicated as they say, wouldn't you need lot more time.
Second, in the last "Agora press release" there was a statement by DP,
" Pohl noted that in 2005 Patriot shifted its focus from making and marketing its microprocessor to licensing its patent portfolio. More than 400 manufacturing companies around the globe have been put on notice that they appear to be infringing on proprietary intellectual property in Patriot's jointly owned patent portfolio. Pohl said 15 major global manufacturers signed license agreements in the past 14 months, including HP, Casio, Fujitsu, Sony, Nikon, Seiko Epson, Pentax, Olympus, Kenwood, Agilent, Lexmark, Schneider Electric, NEC Corporation and Funai Electric. Intel and AMD are also licensees. Negotiations with other well-known names and brands are ongoing."
This is the first time I noticed a comment regarding "Negotiations" on any press release, at least worded so clearly on it implication.
Lastly, why are there so many misspelled words (even the name was incorrectly spelled).
Now before anyone jumps on me for my lack of correct grammar or spelling, I am not writing this professionally. AIMHO
glta
Tom
ps. Ronran, what is your opinion of all of these extensions? TIA