Re: Re Brian......I have had enough....
in response to
by
posted on
Mar 24, 2007 07:58AM
Thank you Ron. IMO, bottom line is that when Brian accepted a role at PTSC, he undoubtedly was required to sign an NDA. As a man of integrity, I'm sure he wouldn't violate that trust/obligation (regardless of potential negative consequences - he essentially gave his word). So anyone expecting him to feed us any info of significance (other than occasional reassurances) is dreaming. And as Ron correctly points out, Brian is NOT a shareholder rep per se, but more a shareholder advocate voicing his advice from the retail shareholder perspective. And that is good for us.... Semantics have come into play I suspect. He can be seen as a "shareholder rep." - he is our voice on the Advisory Board. He is not PTSC's voice to shareholders, but shareholder's voice to PTSC.
JMHOs,
SGE