I also found it interesting that the defense had no expert testimony. If I recall there has been only three examples given representing prior art. The one that most closely resembles us, Magmus, I believe, was presented by us as possible prior art in the oringal patent application, our patent was given and hence it was not recognized by the patent office as as significant. Perhaps any arguments made using it by the defense may be mute since it has already been invalidated by the patent office. It would seem that their only defense would be to invalid our patents through another venue, re-examination.What I am trying to say is, that for them to use expert testimony would only enhance our case. Their only course of action may be to lessen their financial impact as much as possible. This seems to have been their strategy from their very first pacer filing.