To add to what Sedely stated:

Pohl was the one talking about M&As and a CEO with new blood and IB experience. IMO - This would lead one to conclude that we currently need an outside CEO with IM experience in order to process an M&A type of deal - at least according to Pohl's opinion. Why else would he make these statements???

As I explained in my previous post, I just don't get a warm and fuzzy feeling when he states one thing and does something entirely different with no explanation. I really do hope he provides an explanation for the discrepancy in his statement.

I'm adding this to: "I'm totally preplexed about the SP". I'm sure he has a few good ideas at to why our SP is in the sewer. He should just keep silent about it instead of saying "I'm totally perplexed".

I'm glad JT's in and Pohl's out - I don't know what to make of Pohl.