Is THAT the best you could do to counter-argue my post? 

Warrant dump is in OUR long term best interest.

The Divys I doubt were solely due to prompts from S&L.  If S&L were so hot (as you state) to line their pockets with divy money, then why are they dumping the qualified warrants?  So they can collect less money short and long term?

What do you suggest the BoD could have done to cause a higher base?  Introduce more risk via M&A?  I suppose they could have bought back shares on the open market (a point where I think we could agree), but would that have offset S&L's selling to convert?  They also could have perhaps worked a deal to buy back the warrants (another point where we could agree), and THAT would probably have been the best move.  Short of those, what?  Pump with PR, only to see the S&L dump to convert, making PTSC look like a total scam?  Come on man, ideas - your's or those of your influencial friends. You offer none.....

And I'd certainly rather see this BoD in place than some bunch of new guys out to screw us to line their (and your?) pockets.

Can you counter any of my other statements or suspicions?  I even numbered them for you to make it easy....

You seem to be eager to complain and threaten action, soliciting the support of fellow shareholders, but other than suggesting the replacement of board members with suspicious, unidentified characters with unknown (perhaps even to you) motives, what do you offer?

And why NOW?

I await a response of greater substance.  If you're trying to sell us on an idea, tell us what it is.

Thank you!

SGE