They did not file one (8K) on the 19th and issued a PR instead--this obviously upset the defendants or pubat saying that PTSC made claims in order to get the price of stock up. Sounds like the defendants (or whoever) were trying to force PTSC into changing what they said in the PR--PTSC obviously thinks there is no need to do so. I am still wondering about the last pacer filing that Wolf posted the other day as it looks like more info came in AFTER the Judge's decision. GL, ads