brialliant move. TPL argued that Moore was the sole inventor and as such testified in court. The J3 are now going to throw that in its face and argue that TPL testified in court that Moore was a sole invemtor and as such Fish is not an inventor and that th epatents are invalid. TPL can not ( Forget what this is called when you can;t argue one way in 1 case and the opposite way in another case latches??)

So TPL must stipulate that Moore is the Sole inventor and that since FISH is an inventor on the filing then the patents are invaid.

I DO NOT BELIEVE that Judge WARD will be veruy happy with this arguement since this was amicalbly settlrd by the parties and in doing so implies that TPL admitted that they

were incorrect and that FISH was indeed an inventor, This will backfire and teh WARD will flame teh J3 for wasting his time with Nonsense and

tell them to play those games in California but not in the Lone Star state.

But then again when am I ever right !!