We're good.... And I do post some redundant stuff, usually in an effort to respond to another poster, or in response to negativity with little basis. Like my last post about when I think we'll see the PPS move up, and why. That was in response to a question put to me by ttccrr.

When I do post positives, it's usually about the FUTURE and with what I consider a reasonable basis. When I discover that I've missed something or was plain wrong, I'm usually first to point it out (like just the other day regarding my conjecture of last Saturday).

I'm very open to debating the basis of any of my conjecture, if the debate is in earnest. Some (specifically those to which my ire is directed) virtually never contest my conjecture about the future. People say they want to hear both sides. Where's that the other side where the future is concerned? It's not coming from these folks, other than "the BoD is incompitent - we're doomed" based on PAST performance, ignoring recent evidence to the contrary.

Some focus on the past, and refocus and refocus without changing the view. Alot of the conjecture about the past (which is pretty meaningless) is based on KNOWNs, and alot not.

Trust but verify. I like it, but how do you verify?

Respectfully,

SGE