Exactly,imo. Is one to believe the USPTO documents that state that all 10 patents had co-inventorship or the Fish to Higgins letter that states the patents could be pretty easily separated by individual inventorship?

Did Calif. court delve into this technicality when determining inventorship? If so...great, but I didn't think they had when this issue was last being disscussed and most here thought it of no importance. Agree fully that if this doesn't work for the defense, it is game over.

Been away all summer, can you brief me on the status of trial and or upcoming events? Thanks for everything you've been doing here. joe