Higgins's improper statements are no more admissible as evidence in the Eastern District of Texas in 2007 than they were in the Northern District of California in 2005. By protesting Higgins's and former counsel's misconduct in 2004, and successfully litigating his ethics claims against them all the way to judgment and through appeal, Charles Moore has done all that he must to maintain the privilege. Neither the passage of time nor plaintiffs' failure to call the Discovery Hotline before defendants convened Higgins' deposition in 2007 has "laundered" Higgins improper statements. Defendants must make their inventorship case using evidence that is admissible.

Just gotta love Roger Cook...........the guy NETS IT OUT!

Soooooooo happy he's working for US!  The guy is Good.......Real Good!

See Oscar........once in a while I poke my head out. :-)

GLTA

deb