Re: Question for the longs, No.. - Head
in response to
by
posted on
Oct 02, 2007 09:28AM
You say:
"SGE you obviously take adversarial positions with certain posters, myself included, regardless of the content of the post. And if anytime something by the company is questioned or criticized, you take offense."
Regardless of the content of the post? Not hardly. Think about the response above, and what MMs are SUPPOSED to be doing. You start talking about them taking short positions or loading up with THEIR money, when their real, reliable bread and butter is making trades and profiting on the spread between the bit and ask - with zero risk. And somehow you surmise that the MM actions you suggest would be better accomplished on low volume days? Really. Apparently I'm ignorant, so please explain this to me. THAT was the purpose of my post, and all such posts - questioning the illogical (to me) or the pure speculation for things that have multiple logical explanations - yours possibly included - but you (and the others you refer to) choose one (illogical to me) explanation and pronounce it THE explanation, steadfast. Or you opt as in this last response, and declare the argument "pointless". Why would a MM waste resources reading through garbage on RB to guide their activities? Talk about pointless.... and illogical.
I just have a natural tendency to question the illogical regardless of who posts it, and to have a little better attitude about a company where I'm invested Long. So be it if the same ole posters consistently post illogical propositions and with a negative slant on MY company. Like that's surprising.
SGE