There are always (mischievious) ways of masking the existence of monopolistic business practice when it suits. As well as concealing mischief in the financial markets. If big business practice remains politically unassailable then why bother with a gratuitous statement for the record, if not required by law. It`s like the warning lables on packaged products. Perhaps we tend to underestimate the checks to balance that the freelance legal profession provides to policing abuses. Go to your congressman and asked to be stroked and reassured then sue the bum and find a candidate worth their salt. That`s what big business pays for with their contributions. It`s the underdog small business (albiet public traded)that must prevail with more attention to veracity, details and the harsh reality of real competion. I hope I`m not offending with my having butted in with a contextual misunderstanding of the discussion, just my grist.

Raillery standing watch mode: silent running. Codename Arrrg, eh,eh,eh