"This action was begun on October 24, 2005, when plaintiff Technology Properties Limited filed its Complaint for Patent Infringement against twenty (20) defendants."
Does the J3 wish to make a point of the fact that there was another case started in CA. Would that somehow play into the notion of the Higgins mess judgement request?
Something smells with this recap, I dont' get it, sure it mentions the settlements but what else is there to help the J's ......? Must be a reason.
seems fishy (no pun)