So if I get this right the defendants are still trying to use information that is tainted or was deemed at one time not admissable due to ACP.

but if they could get the same information from another means that was not presented by the letters or thru Higgins testifying himself it could be used in this case?

I don't know how they could get the same information elsewhere.

So are most here 50/50 on the fence and just waiting to see which way Judge Ward pushes the Higgins issue? Can he easily go either way? If someone thinks so, I don't see it. I see it as still ACP and non admissable. Yes, different case, but information could still be used against Mr. Moore which is not allowable. His name is on the Pattents not TPL.

I may be totally out in left field here.

JMO

wanabe