What is your take on the article above? The only thing that I can figure is that AMD had already denied the use of the tech. It would be hard for them to suddenly say, ``Yes we use it and have been using it for years``--saving face is the way that I see it. IMO,they NEVER would have invested in this co. if there was no reason to. This IP attorney out of Boston seems like a bright fellow. Will do some DD on him. tia, ads