Whenever either side makes a motion, they include a "text of proposed order" which essentially helps the judge simply put his signature to a piece of paper as opposed to having a member of his staff draw up the paper. When a motion is opposed (such as the atty/client privileged ones we've seen recently), each side attaches their proposed order, to read as beneficial to their respective side, and the judge chooses one to sign. Or, he can decide that he doesn't see it one way or the other and draw up his own order.

So, the 2nd Pacer filing from today was but a PROPOSED order, not one signed (yet) by Judge Ward. As others here have explained, it's all but likely that he'll sign it, since both sides agree and, I would guess, he had advance word this was coming.

JMHO/GLTAL