By granting the stay, the Court has in effect gone on vacation for 30 days. On December 1, it's business as usual and back to the schedule, which hasn't changed, at least in respect to the trial date.

It is interesting that the stay has meant that the judge does not have to rule on existing motions, but ACP will have to be addressed at some point. If left undecided, it leaves a loophole for subsequent plaintiffs to use as a defence.

So, until December 1, it's a question of waiting(speculating), waiting(speculating), and waiting(speculating), unless the USPTO or Court release further information.

There is no way of telling what will happen during the stay.

Be well