The part from PTSC was taken from a SEC file. GL, ads

http://www.reuters.com/article/marke...

http://biz.yahoo.com/bw/071115/20071...

Intel and Other Licenses. The licenses from Patriot to Intel Corporation and AMD
each involved a one-time fee to Patriot. Intel or AMD microprocessors that may
be used in various products by other electronics companies, such as the five
Japanese manufacturers originally sued by Patriot as mentioned above, will now
be covered by either the Intel license or the AMD license, as the case may be.
However, it is important to point out that products or systems containing Intel
chips, for example, will typically contain several other microprocessors that
are using our technology and are not currently covered by a license, such as in
sound cards and graphics controllers as just a couple of examples. Such products
are very likely infringing by using technology covered by the patents included
in the Patriot/TPL patent portfolio without appropriate licenses.

The significance of the licenses to Intel, for example, should also be viewed
from the perspective of the fact that the 7 fundamental patents in our Patent
Portfolio cover techniques widely used in designing microprocessors, Digital
Signal Processors (DSPs), embedded processors and system-on-chip solutions. From
this broad perspective, even though it is a respected giant in its industry
segment, Intel's products reportedly represent a small percentage of the broad
array of product designs used in electronics products worldwide. A significant
number of infringing products are produced by companies yet to be approached
regarding opportunities to become properly licensed.