Good to see you back my friend!

You said: 

As far as teremoto's theory that Swartz has an agreement to sell linked to the divs given out - why would management ever enter into an agreement like that?

What if you inserted the word "controlled" in front of sell? IMO S&L owns a lot of shares, and they could tank this stock by selling a lot of shares in a short amount of time. It seems to me (and I am not educated in this area so bear with me) that when you allow someone like Swartz to have such a large stake in your company, that you have to predefine the rules for entry, and exiting this stock.

Now, with that said, Pohl stated at the SHM he was perplexed by share price. Some will argue that the above theory doesn't hold water (and maybe it doesn't) or why would have Pohl made that statement unless he was lieing? Well, maybe Pohl is perplexed because he thought by controlling S&L's selling, he could control share price?

Like I said yesterday, I just don't get it! Maybe the simple lack of transparency is what is keeping this stock down? Maybe Texas will finally be what removes transparency, and this stock will fly? I am hoping so, as I have only been a buyer for the last 2 1/2 years (bought my last chunck of shares last week). I am content being a holder for a while, but I won't be buying anymore. Well, at least if I ever tell you that I am buying more..please kick me! LOL

Good luck to you, me, us, and all longs.