"The order grants a stay in the proceedings..............................pending the United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) completion of proceedings with respect to TiVo's request for reexamination of those patents.

There is no such language in the motion filed in the PTSC case.  Not to mention, several here have posted Judge Ward having voiced an opinion that he doesn't typically view patent re-exams as worthy of a stay as their outcome typically wouldn't contribute much as far as clarity on a proceeding.