But do not think there has been any discussion of it. That is, if Judge Ward ruled against TPL on ACP behind the scenes, would there be a 30 day stay? The reason for asking is just that everyone is so confident that the stay is for a settlement in TPLs favor. It would be helpful to understand WHY that is necessarily so. I do not know enough about the legal system and the options for TPL. Would TPL continue on to trial with ACP allowed? Would the Js agree to a stay to settle? Could we win at trial even with ACP allowed? Would appeal of the ACP decision have to come post trial? It is not my intent to try to rain on anyone's parade, but I have quite a few pesos riding on this, (probably too many) so naturally a bit nervous not fully understanding the logic of why settlement MUST be our favor. TIA for any reassurances. Opty